Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Political Parties and Ideologies

Political parties are groups of like-minded individuals who seek to realize their shared goals by fielding candidates at elections and thereby securing election to public office. Most conventional parties would ultimately aim to emerge victorious at a general election, and thereby earn the right to form a government. In this respect, parties differ significantly from pressure groups, for while some pressure groups employ electoral candidacy as a means of raising public awareness of their chosen cause, they generally have little interest in being in office.

A political party has to have mass and inclusive membership as well as a formal structure that extends from the Village/Town/Municipality through Tehsil/Taluk and Zila/District to the State and National level, paralleling the administrative structure of government. It is little wonder that founding a viable political party is such a daunting task in a multi-ethnic, multi-cultural and multi-language country like India. Does it need a formal organization? What form or shape will such an organization take? How will it be funded? What will be the vision, the glue that will sustain it through its critical life cycle phases of inception, infancy and growth?

Ideology has to be the critical underpinnings of such an organization. Or does it? Should vision be based on ideology? So what is ideology?

"An ideology is a set of conscious and unconscious ideas that constitute one's goals, expectations and actions."

Sure. But how do you find a set of people with a common set of ideas? Is it something that can be proposed by a dominant class of a society to all members of the society, a "received consciousness", a product of socialization?



A political ideology is a certain ethical set of ideals, principals, doctrines, myths, or symbols of a social movement, institution, class or a large group that explains how society should work, offers some political and cultural blueprint for a certain social order.

Political ideology largely concerns itself with how to allocate power and to what ends it should be used. Some parties follow a certain ideology very closely, while others may take broad inspiration from a group of related ideologies without specifically embracing any one of them.

Political ideologies have two dimensions:
1. Goals: how society should work
2. Methods: The most appropriate ways to achieve the ideal arrangement

Typically, each ideology contains certain ideas on what it considers to be the best form of government (democracy, theocracy, caliphate etc) and the best economic system (capitalism, socialism, communism, etc).

Ideologies also identify themselves by their position on the political spectrum (left, centre, right) though it is rare for a political party to hold one position on the spectrum. A position is more likely to be associated with an issue, rather that with its ideology. Of course, the bi-axis model (figure below, based on Nolan's chart) is often used to better explain the concept of an ideological spectrum.




Ideologies can also be distinguished from political strategies (eg, populism) and from single issues that a party may be built around (for eg., eliminating corruption).

 
Philosopher Michael Oakeshott provides a good definition of ideology as:

"the formalized abridgement of the supposed sub-stratum of the rational truth contained in the tradition". 

Ideologies are systems of abstract thought applied to public matters and thus makes this concept central to politics. Even if not explicitly expressed, implicitly, every political tendency entails an ideology.

But then we have had political ideologies for eons.
Are we any better as a society for it?
Is there a better model?

REFERENCES
1. Rethinking political ideologies: Chiarelli, Salvatore [2009]
2. Links in "Ideology Study Guide"
3. Lenin and philosophy and other essays; Louis Althusser [1971]
4. Ideology and Symbolic Power: Between Althusser and Bourdieu [2009]




 

Monday, March 25, 2013

About this blog?

We all have our opinions! Some write them, some twitter about it, some appear on TV shows. And some blog it!

I am fed up with the narrow minded activity that politics has been reduced to in our country. The terms of the UPA-2 is coming to an end and thank god for that! There is only so much of crap that citizens can take.



But what are the alternatives? BJP is a party that is falling apart with the weight of its own contradictions. Modi could be a great big hope, but in the era of coalition governments, what can one man do? Of course, one can remain hopeful until he proves otherwise. More likely, unless there are some very rapid developments and BJP transforms itself by retiring the old guard, brings in fresh new faces and reinvents and rebrands itself as the "New BJP", we will be getting more of the same, albeit, in a different container!

3rd front? Well, less said the better.

Aam Admi Party? At least their heart appears to be in the right place, though their execution leaves much to be desired. The pace is frenetic and they are in too much of a hurry. If they have to succeed, then they have to give it time and adopt an approach that is both creative and universally applicable for general good.

"General good"! That was once the credo of democracy. What is good for the goose is good for the gander. Right? Wrong! Democracy appears to be a lot more complicated and what given to one always appears to have been taken from another.

So what is the solution? Is there a system that will work better than democracy? Or should a democracy be run differently?

The systems of a democracy as vast and complex as ours needs to go back to the drawing board to be redesigned ground up. The result may or may not be very different to the system we have in place now. If the gaps are small, all we need are a few tweaks to set it right. And if the gaps are large, we have the challenge of a transformation.

I will use this blog to clarify my own mind.
You, the readers of this blog, are quite welcome to use this material, if useful.